Prince Andrew, Goga Ashkenazi & her secret baby
By Clarencia Cynrae on March 30th, 2008Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, and Goga Ashkenazi had a dinner date at his favourite Chinese food restaurant. The newspaper said that she had given birth 3 days ago. Did the Prince know?
Goga’s real name was Gaukhar Berkalieva. She was born in Kazakhstan in 1980. Her mother is Saule Aralbayeva.
Goga with Timur Kulibayev, supposedly the father of her baby.
Prince Andrew has sold his home for £15million to Energy tycoon Kenes Rakishev, 29, from Kazakhstan. Prince Andrew had business dealings with Kenes Rakishev. Kenes Rakishev, 29, bought Sunninghill Park from the Prince for £3million more than its £12million estimated price tag.
Prince Andrew brokers deals with UK-Kazakhstan. Kenes Rakishev’s father in law was the former Kazakh prime minister Imangali Tasmagambetov. These people had the right connections to do business.
Last summer, Prince Andrew introduced Oxford-educated Ms Goga Ashkenazy, CEO of an oil and gas engineering company, to Queen Elizabeth at Royal Ascot. In February 2007, Prince Andrew and Ms Goga Ashkenazy were both guest speakers at a trade conference in Doha, Qatar. In December 2007, they were seen dining together at a Chinese restaurant in Ascot. This December meeting was reported by a newspaper. It said that Goga Ashkenazy had just delivered a secret baby 3 days ago when she met Prince Andrew.
Please click here for more recent posts.
mobile device
March 30th, 2008 at 1:13 pm
In the abovementioned story it is mentioned that “Timur Kulibayev, is supposedly the father of her baby” . Supposedly means that there is doubt that it could be someone else’s baby. Andrew must be close to her if he had a meal with her only 3 days after her giving birth. Does this possibly mean that Andrew could be the father of the child or is it the “supposed Timur Kulibayev? Have you got any photos of the newborn? If it’s anglo appearance than it’s Prince Andrew’s. This is my conclusion of your story or they are just good friends.
March 30th, 2008 at 10:54 pm
Dear Malia,
To give the other party the benefit of the doubt, “supposedly” was written in. The original source has more information if anyone is interested enough to read on. Even sources can be wrong so it is better to be cautious. All the people had business dealings and it was a complicated web.
Thanks for reading and commenting.